[frers-list]complete refit soon underway,
what changes would you make ?
Arthur Kelley
frers-list@lists.frers33.com
Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:22:27 -0400
--Boundary_(ID_5+cL2hzQev1zhyxmfbG+9g)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
If I get your point about the rudder, it is a free standing spade rudder whi=
ch is fairly well protected by the deep keel. Rudders are vulnerable when th=
ey extend below the depth of the keel and are exposed to the odd passing roc=
k. I've seen this on some Hunter or Catalina wing keel boats. I hope between=
Frers and Carroll Marine they avoided this situation. The solution would be=
to consider shortening the depth and increasing the fore-aft length of the r=
udder maintaining the same area.=20
Did you buy hull #54 ex-Frers-a-Jack from West Palm Beach, Florida? =20
To echo the sentiments of many here, if you want a round the world cruiser, p=
erhaps you would best consider cleaning this boat up and selling it (most se=
lling between $40K and $55K) and buying a heavier cruiser. I you want a fas=
t coastal cruiser, you've hit the mark and should just clean up the rough ed=
ges.=20
My only real gripes are minor, like draining the cockpit via through hulls b=
elow the water line makes the boat look nicer, but I would have preferred ab=
ove the waterline, preferably out the transom for safety. Also in my humble o=
pinion the rudder is not well designed/balanced for use with a tiller so I c=
onverted back to a wheel (Edson CDi) and like the results a lot. No handling=
issues.=20
Good luck,
Art=20
On Aug 19, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Courtney Thomas <courtneycthomas@bellsouth.net>=
wrote:
> Dave,
>=20
> Thanks for the considered reply.
>=20
> I fully understand the motives regarding caveats applicable to underbody a=
nd rig alteration and will heed.
>=20
> My boat was described by the seller as a wing keel, on which I've found no=
specifics. I'd like to know the draft
> with this keel and what others think of it vis-a-vis the standard fin.
>=20
> I'll plan on a multiply reefable main. Thanks for the suggestion.
>=20
> What do you think of continuing the rod rigging ? To what other types of s=
tanding rigging have others chosen
> and with what results ?
>=20
> Do you know where I can view a picture [or find the specs] of a properly d=
one "deck tie down" ?
>=20
> Advantage of inboard shrouds is gratefully noted.
>=20
> I had planned on adding a bimini/dodger. Has no one satisfactorily added a=
bimini ?
>=20
> Has no one done anything to the stock rudder installation to render it les=
s vulnerable ?
>=20
> Gratefully,
>=20
> Courtney
>=20
> On 8/19/2011 1:06 PM, Dave Nauber wrote:
>>=20
>> Hi Courtney,
>> =20
>> I have read the few other replies and thought I would put in my two cents=
.
>> =20
>> As Joyce says, the Frers 33 is a well designed boat that is both beautifu=
l and seaworthy. I would approach any structural modifications with caution,=
especially if they involve the sail plan or under water appendages.
>> =20
>> If you shorten the keel to give access to more harbors, consider a bulb o=
r some means of maintaining the righting moment. Shortening the rig would no=
t likely be much of an advantage (unless you need to clear a fixed bridge) b=
ecause it limits the sail area when you need/want it. You can always reef an=
d use smaller headsails when over powered, so I would recommend a mainsail w=
ith multiple reef points.
>> =20
>> Apparently not all boats have a deck tie-down (turnbuckle joining the fro=
nt of the mast to the deck inside the cabin) to keep the dec=
k from flexing in breeze and waves. I would install that if it=E2=80=99s not=
there.
>> =20
>> The advantage of the double-spreader rig is that the shrouds are further i=
nboard at the deck, allowing for a narrower sheeting angle. Changing this ar=
rangement will compromise your upwind performance, so I woul=
dn=E2=80=99t modify it.
>> =20
>> If I were going to exclusively cruise the boat I would focus on optimizin=
g for navigation, auto helm, refrigeration, add water holding capacity and i=
nstalling a newer stove/oven. I would break down and add a sleek dodger and c=
ome up with a shade to be used at anchor that could be removed when underway=
. I think the boom is too low to do a bimini properly.
>> =20
>> That=E2=80=99s it for me. Anyone else have ideas or comments?
>> =20
>> BTW, you can beat a well sailed Frers 36, especially in light air, but it=
=E2=80=99s not easy!
>> =20
>> Regards,
>> =20
>> Dave Nauber
>> Wolverine
>> =20
>> From: frers-list-admin@lists.frers33.com [mailto:frers-list-admin@lists.f=
rers33.com] On Behalf Of joberdorf@optonline.net
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 5:34 PM
>> To: frers-list@lists.frers33.com
>> Subject: Re: [frers-list]complete refit soon underway, what changes would=
you make ?
>> =20
>> Courtney:
>> =20
>> I will let others speak to the class rules specifically. But suffice it t=
o say that to significantly alter the boat would make the frers a different=
boat. Barry Carroll got a lot right when he designed it. It was Boat of the=
Year at that time. By far, the sweetest sailing Frers. This has nothing to=
do with being a purist-- it has to do with the design of the boat.
>> However, here is what I know:
>> 1. Running backs have been modified on some boats (placement of on deck v=
aries, mostly between tiller and wheel boats)
>> 2. Keel has been slightly modified on some boats. Wolverine has a slight=
ly shorter keel that's "thicker" (hence better downwind). Others, have the s=
tandard depth keel. Boats such as Impetuous, and Checkmate (which followed I=
mpetuous' lead) faired the trailing edge and therefore extended it to a fine=
edge. So you'll see slight variations. But these are all allowed within cla=
ss rules.
>> 3. Never heard of anyone shortening the mast. I heard of a Frers =
41 owner LENGthening the boom (whichis a real pain in the butt in l=
ight air vis a vis the backstay) and another lengthening the mast and keepin=
g the boom. But these were entirely different boats.
>> 4. Mast Steps have been strengthened in nearly every boat, over time. Min=
e was done by prior owner at New England Boatworks.
>> 5. Rudder bearings have been changed in nearly every boat. For me, twice=
so far in 15 yrs.
>> 6. Most rod rigging is replaced as it wears, but not reconfigured. In te=
rms of other rigging, I've seen different mainsheet arrangements in terms of=
block purchase vs. fine tune, and most boats have installed the Harken trav=
eller system.
>> 7. Spinnaker poles are now carbon fiber, etc, but not changed otherwise.
>> =20
>> I presume you bought the Frers because you actually liked the boat?
>> =20
>> Joyce (Checkmate owner)
>>=20
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Courtney Thomas=20
>> Date: Monday, August 15, 2011 4:15 pm
>> Subject: [frers-list]complete refit soon underway, what changes would you=
make ?
>> To: frers-list@lists.frers33.com
>>=20
>> > Ahoy !
>> >=20
>> > I am about to undertake a complete refit of a Frers33 and would=20
>> > appreciate all input regarding
>> > changes you would make vis-a-vis the original assemblage, if you=20
>> > had the=20
>> > same opportunity.
>> >=20
>> > Any suggestions regarding materials and technique regarding=20
>> > typical=20
>> > maintenance and restorative
>> > procedures are welcome as well, of course.
>> >=20
>> > In particular... keel reattachment, hull deck joint, deck=20
>> > reinforcement,=20
>> > mast support, mast reconfiguration,
>> > and rigging, both standing and running, and rudder=20
>> > reinstallation... are=20
>> > of particular concern,
>> > as I'd hate like hell to bear this expense and later come to=20
>> > grief over=20
>> > a choice that could easily now be made
>> > that would have made a much more salutary difference in time to come.
>> >=20
>> > An additional note is that the standing rigging is what I assume=20
>> > was the=20
>> > original 'rod' rigging.
>> >=20
>> > My primary interest is not racing, rather cruising.
>> >=20
>> > Has anyone shortened or otherwise altered the original mast ?
>> >=20
>> > Has anyone gone outboard with the chainplates ?
>> >=20
>> > Please include intended consequences of any suggested alterations.
>> >=20
>> > Hoping to not cause a firestorm from Frers purists :-)
>> >=20
>> > In any case, no alterations have been yet made,...
>> >=20
>> > Appreciatively,
>> >=20
>> > Courtney Thomas
>> >=20
>> > --=20
>> > Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power,
>> > have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing
>> > government, and form a new one that suits them better,
>> > This is a most valuable - a most sacred right - a right,
>> > which we hope and believe, is to liberate the world.
>> > Abraham Lincoln
>> >=20
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > frers-list mailing list
>> > frers-list@lists.frers33.com
>> > http://lists.frers33.com/mailman/listinfo/frers-list
>> >
>=20
--Boundary_(ID_5+cL2hzQev1zhyxmfbG+9g)
Content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
<html><body bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"><div>If I get your point about the rudder, i=
t is a free standing spade rudder which is fairly well protected by the deep=
keel. Rudders are vulnerable when they extend below the depth of the keel a=
nd are exposed to the odd passing rock. I've seen this on some Hunter or Cat=
alina wing keel boats. I hope between Frers and Carroll Marine they avoided t=
his situation. The solution would be to consider shortening the depth and in=
creasing the fore-aft length of the rudder maintaining the same area. <=
/div><div><br></div><div>Did you buy hull #54 ex-Frers-a-Jack from West Palm=
Beach, Florida? <br><br></div><div>To echo the sentiments of many her=
e, if you want a round the world cruiser, perhaps you would best consider cl=
eaning this boat up and selling it (most selling between $40K and $55K) and b=
uying a heavier cruiser. I you want a fast coastal cruiser, you've hit=
the mark and should just clean up the rough edges. </div><div><br></di=
v><div>My only real gripes are minor, like draining the cockpit via through h=
ulls below the water line makes the boat look nicer, but I would have prefer=
red above the waterline, preferably out the transom for safety. Also in my h=
umble opinion the rudder is not well designed/balanced for use with a tiller=
so I converted back to a wheel (Edson CDi) and like the results a lot. No h=
andling issues. </div><div><br></div><div>Good luck,<br>Art </div>=
<div><br>On Aug 19, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Courtney Thomas <<a href=3D"mailto:=
courtneycthomas@bellsouth.net">courtneycthomas@bellsouth.net</a>> wrote:<=
br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div>
Dave,<br>
<br>
Thanks for the considered reply.<br>
<br>
I fully understand the motives regarding caveats applicable to
underbody and rig alteration and will heed.<br>
<br>
My boat was described by the seller as a wing keel, on which I've
found no specifics. I'd like to know the draft<br>
with this keel and what others think of it vis-a-vis the standard
fin.<br>
<br>
I'll plan on a multiply reefable main. Thanks for the suggestion.<br>
<br>
What do you think of continuing the rod rigging ? To what other
types of standing rigging have others chosen<br>
and with what results ?<br>
<br>
Do you know where I can view a picture [or find the specs] of a
properly done "deck tie down" ?<br>
<br>
Advantage of inboard shrouds is gratefully noted.<br>
<br>
I had planned on adding a bimini/dodger. Has no one satisfactorily
added a bimini ?<br>
<br>
Has no one done anything to the stock rudder installation to render
it less vulnerable ?<br>
<br>
Gratefully,<br>
<br>
Courtney<br>
<br>
On 8/19/2011 1:06 PM, Dave Nauber wrote:
<blockquote cite=3D"mid:db64c334-276a-4161-84c2-1eda0f746d1b@classeaudio=
.com" type=3D"cite">
=20
=20
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]--><o:smarttagtype namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office=
:smarttags" name=3D"PersonName">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0pt;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Arial;
color:navy;}
@page Section1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class=3D"Section1">
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">Hi Courtney,<o:p></o:p>=
</span></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"><o:p> </o:p></span=
></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">I have read the few
other replies and
thought I would put in my two cents. <o:p></o:p></span></fon=
t></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"><o:p> </o:p></span=
></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">As Joyce says, the
Frers 33 is a well
designed boat that is both beautiful and seaworthy. I
would approach any
structural modifications with caution, especially if
they involve the sail plan
or under water appendages. <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"><o:p> </o:p></span=
></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">If you shorten the
keel to give access to
more harbors, consider a bulb or some means of
maintaining the righting moment.
Shortening the rig would not likely be much of an
advantage (unless you need to
clear a fixed bridge) because it limits the sail area
when you need/want it.
You can always reef and use smaller headsails when over
powered, so I would
recommend a mainsail with multiple reef points. <o:p></o:p><=
/span></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"><o:p> </o:p></span=
></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">Apparently not all
boats have a deck
tie-down (turnbuckle joining the front of the mast to
the deck inside the cabin)
to keep the deck from flexing in breeze and waves. I
would install that if it=E2=80=99s
not there.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"><o:p> </o:p></span=
></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">The advantage of
the double-spreader rig
is that the shrouds are further inboard at the deck,
allowing for a narrower
sheeting angle. Changing this arrangement will
compromise your upwind
performance, so I wouldn=E2=80=99t modify it.<o:p></o:p></sp=
an></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"><o:p> </o:p></span=
></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">If I were going to
exclusively cruise the
boat I would focus on optimizing for navigation, auto
helm, refrigeration, add
water holding capacity and installing a newer
stove/oven. I would break down
and add a sleek dodger and come up with a shade to be
used at anchor that could
be removed when underway. I think the boom is too low to
do a bimini properly.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"><o:p> </o:p></span=
></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">That=E2=80=99s it for m=
e.
Anyone else have
ideas or comments?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"><o:p> </o:p></span=
></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">BTW, you <i><span style=
=3D"font-style:italic">can</span></i>
beat a well sailed Frers 36, especially in light air,
but it=E2=80=99s not easy!<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"><o:p> </o:p></span=
></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">Regards,<o:p></o:p></sp=
an></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"><o:p> </o:p></span=
></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">Dave Nauber<o:p></o:p><=
/span></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy">Wolverine<o:p></o:p></s=
pan></font></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font color=3D"navy" face=3D"Arial" size=3D=
"2"><span style=3D"font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"><o:p> </o:p></span=
></font></p>
<div>
<div class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"text-align:center" align=3D"ce=
nter"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"><span style=3D"font-size:12.=
0pt">
<hr tabindex=3D"-1" align=3D"center" size=3D"2" width=3D"1=
00%">
</span></font></div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><b><font face=3D"Tahoma" size=3D"2"><span=
style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold">From:</span></font>=
</b><font face=3D"Tahoma" size=3D"2"><span style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-fa=
mily:Tahoma">
<a class=3D"moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href=3D"mailto:frers=
-list-admin@lists.frers33.com"><a href=3D"mailto:frers-list-admin@lists.frer=
s33.com">frers-list-admin@lists.frers33.com</a></a>
[<a class=3D"moz-txt-link-freetext" href=3D"mailto:frers-l=
ist-admin@lists.frers33.com"><a href=3D"mailto:frers-list-admin@lists.frers3=
3.com">mailto:frers-list-admin@lists.frers33.com</a></a>] <b><span style=3D"=
font-weight:bold">On Behalf Of </span></b><st1:personname w:st=3D"on"><a cla=
ss=3D"moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href=3D"mailto:joberdorf@optonline.net"><a h=
ref=3D"mailto:joberdorf@optonline.net">joberdorf@optonline.net</a></a></st1:=
personname><br>
<b><span style=3D"font-weight:bold">Sent:</span></b>
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
5:34 P<st1:personname w:st=3D"on">M</st1:personname><br>
<b><span style=3D"font-weight:bold">To:</span></b> <st1:pe=
rsonname w:st=3D"on"><a class=3D"moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href=3D"mailto:fr=
ers-list@lists.frers33.com"><a href=3D"mailto:frers-list@lists.frers33.com">=
frers-list@lists.frers33.com</a></a></st1:personname><br>
<b><span style=3D"font-weight:bold">Subject:</span></b>
Re: [frers-list]complete
refit soon underway, what changes would you make ?</span><=
/font><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"><=
span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"=
><span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt">Courtney:<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"=
><span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"=
><span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt">I will let others speak to the class rules
specifically. But suffice it
to say that to significantly alter the boat would
make the frers a
different boat. Barry Carroll got a lot right when he
designed it. It was Boat
of the Year at that time. By far, the sweetest sailing
Frers. This has
nothing to do with being a purist-- it has to do with
the design of the boat. <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"=
><span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt">However, here is what I know:<o:p></o:p></span></f=
ont></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"=
><span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt">1. Running backs have been modified on some
boats (placement of on deck
varies, mostly between tiller and wheel boats)<o:p></o:p><=
/span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"=
><span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt">2. Keel has been slightly modified on some
boats. Wolverine has a
slightly shorter keel that's "thicker" (hence better
downwind).
Others, have the standard depth keel. Boats such as
Impetuous, and
Checkmate (which followed Impetuous' lead) faired the
trailing edge and
therefore extended it to a fine edge. So you'll see
slight variations. But
these are all allowed within class rules.<o:p></o:p></span=
></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"=
><span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt">3. Never heard of anyone shortening the
mast. I heard of a Frers
41 owner LENGthening the boom (whichis a real pain in
the butt in light air vis
a vis the backstay) and another lengthening the mast
and keeping the boom.
But these were entirely different boats.<o:p></o:p></span>=
</font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"=
><span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt">4. <st1:personname w:st=3D"on">M</st1:personname>a=
st
Steps have been
strengthened in nearly every boat, over time. <st1:personn=
ame w:st=3D"on">M</st1:personname>ine
was done by prior owner at New England Boatworks.<o:p></o:=
p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"=
><span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt">5. Rudder bearings have been changed in nearly
every boat. For
me, twice so far in 15 yrs.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"=
><span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt">6. <st1:personname w:st=3D"on">M</st1:personname>o=
st
rod rigging is
replaced as it wears, but not reconfigured. In terms=
of other rigging,
I've seen different mainsheet arrangements in terms of
block purchase vs. fine
tune, and most boats have installed the Harken
traveller system.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"=
><span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt">7. Spinnaker poles are now carbon fiber, etc,
but not changed
otherwise.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"=
><span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"=
><span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt"> I presume you bought the Frers because you
actually liked the
boat?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"=
><span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"=
><span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt">Joyce (Checkmate owner)<o:p></o:p></span></font></=
p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D"3"=
><span style=3D"font-size:
12.0pt"><br>
----- Original <st1:personname w:st=3D"on">M</st1:personna=
me>essage
-----<br>
From: Courtney Thomas <br>
<courtneycthomas@bellsouth.net>Date: <st1:personname w:st=3D=
"on">M</st1:personname>onday,
August 15, 2011 4:15 pm<br>
Subject: [frers-list]complete refit soon underway,
what changes would you make
?<br>
To: <st1:personname w:st=3D"on"><a class=3D"moz-txt-link=
-abbreviated" href=3D"mailto:frers-list@lists.frers33.com"><a href=3D"mailto=
:frers-list@lists.frers33.com">frers-list@lists.frers33.com</a></a></st1:per=
sonname><br>
<br>
> Ahoy !<br>
> <br>
> I am about to undertake a complete refit of a
Frers33 and would <br>
> appreciate all input regarding<br>
> changes you would make vis-a-vis the original
assemblage, if you <br>
> had the <br>
> same opportunity.<br>
> <br>
> Any suggestions regarding materials and
technique regarding <br>
> typical <br>
> maintenance and restorative<br>
> procedures are welcome as well, of course.<br>
> <br>
> In particular... keel reattachment, hull deck
joint, deck <br>
> reinforcement, <br>
> mast support, mast reconfiguration,<br>
> and rigging, both standing and running, and
rudder <br>
> reinstallation... are <br>
> of particular concern,<br>
> as I'd hate like hell to bear this expense and
later come to <br>
> grief over <br>
> a choice that could easily now be made<br>
> that would have made a much more salutary
difference in time to come.<br>
> <br>
> An additional note is that the standing rigging
is what I assume <br>
> was the <br>
> original 'rod' rigging.<br>
> <br>
> <st1:personname w:st=3D"on">M</st1:personname>y
primary interest is not
racing, rather cruising.<br>
> <br>
> Has anyone shortened or otherwise altered the
original mast ?<br>
> <br>
> Has anyone gone outboard with the chainplates ?<br>=
> <br>
> Please include intended consequences of any
suggested alterations.<br>
> <br>
> Hoping to not cause a firestorm from Frers
purists :-)<br>
> <br>
> In any case, no alterations have been yet
made,...<br>
> <br>
> Appreciatively,<br>
> <br>
> Courtney Thomas<br>
> <br>
> -- <br>
> Any people anywhere, being inclined and having
the power,<br>
> have the right to rise up, and shake off the
existing<br>
> government, and form a new one that suits them
better,<br>
> This is a most valuable - a most sacred right -
a right,<br>
> which we hope and believe, is to liberate the
world.<br>
> Abraham Lincoln<br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>=
> frers-list mailing list<br>
> <st1:personname w:st=3D"on"><a class=3D"moz-txt-lin=
k-abbreviated" href=3D"mailto:frers-list@lists.frers33.com"><a href=3D"mailt=
o:frers-list@lists.frers33.com">frers-list@lists.frers33.com</a></a></st1:pe=
rsonname><br>
>
<a class=3D"moz-txt-link-freetext" href=3D"http://lists.=
frers33.com/mailman/listinfo/frers-list"><a href=3D"http://lists.frers33.com=
/mailman/listinfo/frers-list">http://lists.frers33.com/mailman/listinfo/frer=
s-list</a></a><br>
> <o:p></o:p></courtneycthomas@bellsouth.net></span><=
/font></p>
</div>
</div>
</o:smarttagtype></blockquote>
=20
</div></blockquote></body></html>=
--Boundary_(ID_5+cL2hzQev1zhyxmfbG+9g)--