[frers-list]complete refit soon underway, what changes would
you make ?
Courtney Thomas
frers-list@lists.frers33.com
Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:52:09 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050101010201090104010004
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Dave,
Thanks for your generous attention.
Looking for'd to seein' the picture.
I'll plan on sticking with the rod rigging.
Since my primary interest is cruising in the Caribbean, I've apparently
happened on the keel that
would have been my preference anyway :-) though not realizing it to be
an odd duck in the community.
On the other hand Frers and Carroll designed and built and installed it,
so apparently they thought it
was at least OK.
I am a bit familiar with skeg hung rudders and they seem to me to be
much better protected and was wondering what,
if anything, others might have done to render a Frers33's less
vulnerable. But hopefully, my concerns are unwarranted.
Cordially,
Courtney
On 8/19/2011 7:53 PM, David Nauber wrote:
> Hi Courtney,
>
> I'll get a photo of my deck tie-down this weekend and send it to you,
> but it's a pretty simple concept and I don't think it requires much
> precision. You just want to join the deck and mast in a way that can
> counter the load of the halyard turning blocks pulling up on the deck
> as the rig loads up in breeze and waves. If the turning blocks are all
> on the mast instead of the deck (not a typical arrangement) then you
> wouldn't need this.
>
> I would stick with the rod rigging and just make sure it's inspected
> annually to identify potential problems before they fail. We have only
> replaced two turnbuckles so far (as they began to show stress cracks)
> so it lasts a long time. I don't think there is a performance benefit
> from alternatives worth pursuing and we race the boat fairly seriously.
>
> I've never seen a 33 with a wing keel, but I would expect its
> performance to be compromised as Frank says compared to the fin keel.
> If you cruise in shallow harbors it might be worth the tradeoff, but
> if you're looking for better performance, this would be an expensive
> but beneficial modification to consider.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean about rudder vulnerability. Rudder failure
> has not been an issue with the design. but I might be misunderstanding
> the question.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Regards,
>
> Dave Nauber
> Wolverine
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Courtney Thomas <courtneycthomas@bellsouth.net>
> *To:* frers-list@lists.frers33.com
> *Sent:* Friday, August 19, 2011 3:25 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [frers-list]complete refit soon underway, what changes
> would you make ?
>
> Dave,
>
> Thanks for the considered reply.
>
> I fully understand the motives regarding caveats applicable to
> underbody and rig alteration and will heed.
>
> My boat was described by the seller as a wing keel, on which I've
> found no specifics. I'd like to know the draft
> with this keel and what others think of it vis-a-vis the standard fin.
>
> I'll plan on a multiply reefable main. Thanks for the suggestion.
>
> What do you think of continuing the rod rigging ? To what other types
> of standing rigging have others chosen
> and with what results ?
>
> Do you know where I can view a picture [or find the specs] of a
> properly done "deck tie down" ?
>
> Advantage of inboard shrouds is gratefully noted.
>
> I had planned on adding a bimini/dodger. Has no one satisfactorily
> added a bimini ?
>
> Has no one done anything to the stock rudder installation to render it
> less vulnerable ?
>
> Gratefully,
>
> Courtney
>
> On 8/19/2011 1:06 PM, Dave Nauber wrote:
>> Hi Courtney,
>> I have read the few other replies and thought I would put in my two
>> cents.
>> As Joyce says, the Frers 33 is a well designed boat that is both
>> beautiful and seaworthy. I would approach any structural
>> modifications with caution, especially if they involve the sail plan
>> or under water appendages.
>> If you shorten the keel to give access to more harbors, consider a
>> bulb or some means of maintaining the righting moment. Shortening the
>> rig would not likely be much of an advantage (unless you need to
>> clear a fixed bridge) because it limits the sail area when you
>> need/want it. You can always reef and use smaller headsails when over
>> powered, so I would recommend a mainsail with multiple reef points.
>> Apparently not all boats have a deck tie-down (turnbuckle joining the
>> front of the mast to the deck inside the cabin) to keep the deck from
>> flexing in breeze and waves. I would install that if it’s not there.
>> The advantage of the double-spreader rig is that the shrouds are
>> further inboard at the deck, allowing for a narrower sheeting angle.
>> Changing this arrangement will compromise your upwind performance, so
>> I wouldn’t modify it.
>> If I were going to exclusively cruise the boat I would focus on
>> optimizing for navigation, auto helm, refrigeration, add water
>> holding capacity and installing a newer stove/oven. I would break
>> down and add a sleek dodger and come up with a shade to be used at
>> anchor that could be removed when underway. I think the boom is too
>> low to do a bimini properly.
>> That’s it for me. Anyone else have ideas or comments?
>> BTW, you /can/ beat a well sailed Frers 36, especially in light air,
>> but it’s not easy!
>> Regards,
>> Dave Nauber
>> Wolverine
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:*frers-list-admin@lists.frers33.com
>> <mailto:frers-list-admin@lists.frers33.com>
>> [mailto:frers-list-admin@lists.frers33.com] *On Behalf Of *
>> joberdorf@optonline.net <mailto:joberdorf@optonline.net>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 17, 2011 5:34 P M
>> *To:* frers-list@lists.frers33.com <mailto:frers-list@lists.frers33.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [frers-list]complete refit soon underway, what changes
>> would you make ?
>> Courtney:
>> I will let others speak to the class rules specifically. But suffice
>> it to say that to significantly alter the boat would make the frers
>> a different boat. Barry Carroll got a lot right when he designed it.
>> It was Boat of the Year at that time. By far, the sweetest sailing
>> Frers. This has nothing to do with being a purist-- it has to do
>> with the design of the boat.
>> However, here is what I know:
>> 1. Running backs have been modified on some boats (placement of on
>> deck varies, mostly between tiller and wheel boats)
>> 2. Keel has been slightly modified on some boats. Wolverine has a
>> slightly shorter keel that's "thicker" (hence better downwind).
>> Others, have the standard depth keel. Boats such as Impetuous, and
>> Checkmate (which followed Impetuous' lead) faired the trailing edge
>> and therefore extended it to a fine edge. So you'll see slight
>> variations. But these are all allowed within class rules.
>> 3. Never heard of anyone shortening the mast. I heard of a Frers 41
>> owner LENGthening the boom (whichis a real pain in the butt in light
>> air vis a vis the backstay) and another lengthening the mast and
>> keeping the boom. But these were entirely different boats.
>> 4. M ast Steps have been strengthened in nearly every boat, over
>> time. M ine was done by prior owner at New England Boatworks.
>> 5. Rudder bearings have been changed in nearly every boat. For me,
>> twice so far in 15 yrs.
>> 6. M ost rod rigging is replaced as it wears, but not reconfigured.
>> In terms of other rigging, I've seen different mainsheet arrangements
>> in terms of block purchase vs. fine tune, and most boats have
>> installed the Harken traveller system.
>> 7. Spinnaker poles are now carbon fiber, etc, but not changed otherwise.
>> I presume you bought the Frers because you actually liked the boat?
>> Joyce (Checkmate owner)
>>
>> ----- Original M essage -----
>> From: Courtney Thomas
>> Date: M onday, August 15, 2011 4:15 pm
>> Subject: [frers-list]complete refit soon underway, what changes would
>> you make ?
>> To: frers-list@lists.frers33.com <mailto:frers-list@lists.frers33.com>
>>
>> > Ahoy !
>> >
>> > I am about to undertake a complete refit of a Frers33 and would
>> > appreciate all input regarding
>> > changes you would make vis-a-vis the original assemblage, if you
>> > had the
>> > same opportunity.
>> >
>> > Any suggestions regarding materials and technique regarding
>> > typical
>> > maintenance and restorative
>> > procedures are welcome as well, of course.
>> >
>> > In particular... keel reattachment, hull deck joint, deck
>> > reinforcement,
>> > mast support, mast reconfiguration,
>> > and rigging, both standing and running, and rudder
>> > reinstallation... are
>> > of particular concern,
>> > as I'd hate like hell to bear this expense and later come to
>> > grief over
>> > a choice that could easily now be made
>> > that would have made a much more salutary difference in time to come.
>> >
>> > An additional note is that the standing rigging is what I assume
>> > was the
>> > original 'rod' rigging.
>> >
>> > M y primary interest is not racing, rather cruising.
>> >
>> > Has anyone shortened or otherwise altered the original mast ?
>> >
>> > Has anyone gone outboard with the chainplates ?
>> >
>> > Please include intended consequences of any suggested alterations.
>> >
>> > Hoping to not cause a firestorm from Frers purists :-)
>> >
>> > In any case, no alterations have been yet made,...
>> >
>> > Appreciatively,
>> >
>> > Courtney Thomas
>> >
>> > --
>> > Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power,
>> > have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing
>> > government, and form a new one that suits them better,
>> > This is a most valuable - a most sacred right - a right,
>> > which we hope and believe, is to liberate the world.
>> > Abraham Lincoln
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > frers-list mailing list
>> > frers-list@lists.frers33.com <mailto:frers-list@lists.frers33.com>
>> > http://lists.frers33.com/mailman/listinfo/frers-list
>> >
>
>
--------------050101010201090104010004
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Dave,<br>
<br>
Thanks for your generous attention.<br>
<br>
Looking for'd to seein' the picture.<br>
<br>
I'll plan on sticking with the rod rigging.<br>
<br>
Since my primary interest is cruising in the Caribbean, I've
apparently happened on the keel that <br>
would have been my preference anyway :-) though not realizing it
to be an odd duck in the community.<br>
On the other hand Frers and Carroll designed and built and installed
it, so apparently they thought it<br>
was at least OK.<br>
<br>
I am a bit familiar with skeg hung rudders and they seem to me to be
much better protected and was wondering what,<br>
if anything, others might have done to render a Frers33's less
vulnerable. But hopefully, my concerns are unwarranted.<br>
<br>
Cordially,<br>
<br>
Courtney<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 8/19/2011 7:53 PM, David Nauber wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:1313798036.23284.YahooMailNeo@web59510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times
new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt">
<div><span>Hi Courtney,</span></div>
<div><span><br>
</span></div>
<div><span>I'll get a photo of my deck tie-down this weekend and
send it to you, but it's a pretty simple concept and I don't
think it requires much precision. You just want to join the
deck and mast in a way that can counter the load of the
halyard turning blocks pulling up on the deck as the rig
loads up in breeze and waves. If the turning blocks are all
on the mast instead of the deck (not a typical arrangement)
then you wouldn't need this.</span></div>
<div><span><br>
</span></div>
<div><span>I would stick with the rod rigging and just make sure
it's inspected annually to identify potential problems
before they fail. We have only replaced two turnbuckles so
far (as they began to show stress cracks) so it lasts a long
time. I don't think there is a performance benefit from
alternatives worth pursuing and we race the boat fairly
seriously.</span></div>
<div><span><br>
</span></div>
<div><span>I've never seen a 33 with a wing keel, but I would
expect its performance to be compromised as Frank says
compared to the fin keel. If you cruise in shallow harbors
it might be worth the tradeoff, but if you're looking for
better performance, this would be an expensive but
beneficial modification to consider.</span></div>
<div><span><br>
</span></div>
<div><span>I'm not sure what you mean about rudder
vulnerability. Rudder failure has not been an issue with the
design. but I might be misunderstanding the question.</span></div>
<div><span><br>
</span></div>
<div><span>Good luck!</span></div>
<div><span><br>
</span></div>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Dave Nauber</div>
<div>Wolverine</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman',
'new york', times, serif; ">
<div style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman',
'new york', times, serif; "><font face="Arial" size="2">
<hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b>
Courtney Thomas <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:courtneycthomas@bellsouth.net"><courtneycthomas@bellsouth.net></a><br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:frers-list@lists.frers33.com">frers-list@lists.frers33.com</a><br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b>
Friday, August 19, 2011 3:25 PM<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b>
Re: [frers-list]complete refit soon underway, what changes
would you make ?<br>
</font><br>
<div id="yiv92727026"> Dave,<br>
<br>
Thanks for the considered reply.<br>
<br>
I fully understand the motives regarding caveats
applicable to underbody and rig alteration and will heed.<br>
<br>
My boat was described by the seller as a wing keel, on
which I've found no specifics. I'd like to know the draft<br>
with this keel and what others think of it vis-a-vis the
standard fin.<br>
<br>
I'll plan on a multiply reefable main. Thanks for the
suggestion.<br>
<br>
What do you think of continuing the rod rigging ? To what
other types of standing rigging have others chosen<br>
and with what results ?<br>
<br>
Do you know where I can view a picture [or find the specs]
of a properly done "deck tie down" ?<br>
<br>
Advantage of inboard shrouds is gratefully noted.<br>
<br>
I had planned on adding a bimini/dodger. Has no one
satisfactorily added a bimini ?<br>
<br>
Has no one done anything to the stock rudder installation
to render it less vulnerable ?<br>
<br>
Gratefully,<br>
<br>
Courtney<br>
<br>
On 8/19/2011 1:06 PM, Dave Nauber wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
<style>
<!--
#yiv92727026
_filtered #yiv92727026 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
#yiv92727026
#yiv92727026 p.yiv92727026MsoNormal, #yiv92727026 li.yiv92727026MsoNormal, #yiv92727026 div.yiv92727026MsoNormal
{margin:0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman";}
#yiv92727026 a:link, #yiv92727026 span.yiv92727026MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}
#yiv92727026 a:visited, #yiv92727026 span.yiv92727026MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}
#yiv92727026 span.yiv92727026EmailStyle17
{font-family:Arial;color:navy;}
_filtered #yiv92727026 {margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;}
#yiv92727026 div.yiv92727026Section1
{}
-->
</style>
<div class="yiv92727026Section1">
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; ">Hi
Courtney,</span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; "> </span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; ">I have
read the few other replies and thought I would
put in my two cents. </span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; "> </span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; ">As
Joyce says, the Frers 33 is a well designed boat
that is both beautiful and seaworthy. I would
approach any structural modifications with
caution, especially if they involve the sail
plan or under water appendages. </span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; "> </span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; ">If you
shorten the keel to give access to more harbors,
consider a bulb or some means of maintaining the
righting moment. Shortening the rig would not
likely be much of an advantage (unless you need
to clear a fixed bridge) because it limits the
sail area when you need/want it. You can always
reef and use smaller headsails when over
powered, so I would recommend a mainsail with
multiple reef points. </span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; "> </span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; ">Apparently
not all boats have a deck tie-down (turnbuckle
joining the front of the mast to the deck inside
the cabin) to keep the deck from flexing in
breeze and waves. I would install that if it’s
not there.</span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; "> </span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; ">The
advantage of the double-spreader rig is that the
shrouds are further inboard at the deck,
allowing for a narrower sheeting angle. Changing
this arrangement will compromise your upwind
performance, so I wouldn’t modify it.</span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; "> </span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; ">If I
were going to exclusively cruise the boat I
would focus on optimizing for navigation, auto
helm, refrigeration, add water holding capacity
and installing a newer stove/oven. I would break
down and add a sleek dodger and come up with a
shade to be used at anchor that could be removed
when underway. I think the boom is too low to do
a bimini properly.</span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; "> </span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; ">That’s
it for me. Anyone else have ideas or comments?</span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; "> </span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; ">BTW,
you <i><span style="font-style:italic;">can</span></i>
beat a well sailed Frers 36, especially in light
air, but it’s not easy!</span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; "> </span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; ">Regards,</span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; "> </span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; ">Dave
Nauber</span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; ">Wolverine</span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font color="navy"
face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; color: navy; font-family: Arial; "> </span></font></div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"
style="text-align:center;" align="center"><font
face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;">
<hr tabindex="-1" align="center" size="2"
width="100%"> </span></font></div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><b><font
face="Tahoma" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; font-weight: bold; font-family:
Tahoma; ">From:</span></font></b><font
face="Tahoma" size="2"><span style="font-size:
10pt; font-family: Tahoma; "> <a
moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
class="yiv92727026moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
ymailto="mailto:frers-list-admin@lists.frers33.com" target="_blank"
href="mailto:frers-list-admin@lists.frers33.com">frers-list-admin@lists.frers33.com</a>
[<a moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
class="yiv92727026moz-txt-link-freetext"
ymailto="mailto:frers-list-admin@lists.frers33.com"
target="_blank"
href="mailto:frers-list-admin@lists.frers33.com">mailto:frers-list-admin@lists.frers33.com</a>]
<b><span style="font-weight:bold;">On Behalf
Of </span></b>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
class="yiv92727026moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
ymailto="mailto:joberdorf@optonline.net"
target="_blank"
href="mailto:joberdorf@optonline.net">joberdorf@optonline.net</a><br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</span></b>
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 5:34 P M<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold;">To:</span></b>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
class="yiv92727026moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
ymailto="mailto:frers-list@lists.frers33.com" target="_blank"
href="mailto:frers-list@lists.frers33.com">frers-list@lists.frers33.com</a><br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Subject:</span></b>
Re: [frers-list]complete refit soon underway,
what changes would you make ?</span></font></div>
</div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;"> </span></font></div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;">Courtney:</span></font></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;"> </span></font></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;">I will let others speak to
the class rules specifically. But suffice it
to say that to significantly alter the boat
would make the frers a different boat. Barry
Carroll got a lot right when he designed it.
It was Boat of the Year at that time. By far,
the sweetest sailing Frers. This has nothing
to do with being a purist-- it has to do with
the design of the boat. </span></font></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;">However, here is what I
know:</span></font></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;">1. Running backs have been
modified on some boats (placement of on deck
varies, mostly between tiller and wheel boats)</span></font></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;">2. Keel has been slightly
modified on some boats. Wolverine has a
slightly shorter keel that's "thicker" (hence
better downwind). Others, have the standard
depth keel. Boats such as Impetuous, and
Checkmate (which followed Impetuous' lead)
faired the trailing edge and therefore
extended it to a fine edge. So you'll see
slight variations. But these are all allowed
within class rules.</span></font></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;">3. Never heard of anyone
shortening the mast. I heard of a Frers 41
owner LENGthening the boom (whichis a real
pain in the butt in light air vis a vis the
backstay) and another lengthening the mast and
keeping the boom. But these were entirely
different boats.</span></font></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;">4. M ast Steps have been
strengthened in nearly every boat, over time.
M ine was done by prior owner at New England
Boatworks.</span></font></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;">5. Rudder bearings have
been changed in nearly every boat. For me,
twice so far in 15 yrs.</span></font></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;">6. M ost rod rigging is
replaced as it wears, but not reconfigured.
In terms of other rigging, I've seen different
mainsheet arrangements in terms of block
purchase vs. fine tune, and most boats have
installed the Harken traveller system.</span></font></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;">7. Spinnaker poles are now
carbon fiber, etc, but not changed otherwise.</span></font></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;"> </span></font></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;"> I presume you bought the
Frers because you actually liked the boat?</span></font></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;"> </span></font></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;">Joyce (Checkmate owner)</span></font></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv92727026MsoNormal"><font face="Times
New Roman" size="3"><span style="
font-size:12.0pt;"><br>
----- Original M essage -----<br>
From: Courtney Thomas <br>
Date: M onday, August 15, 2011 4:15 pm<br>
Subject: [frers-list]complete refit soon
underway, what changes would you make ?<br>
To: <a moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
class="yiv92727026moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
ymailto="mailto:frers-list@lists.frers33.com" target="_blank"
href="mailto:frers-list@lists.frers33.com">frers-list@lists.frers33.com</a><br>
<br>
> Ahoy !<br>
> <br>
> I am about to undertake a complete refit
of a Frers33 and would <br>
> appreciate all input regarding<br>
> changes you would make vis-a-vis the
original assemblage, if you <br>
> had the <br>
> same opportunity.<br>
> <br>
> Any suggestions regarding materials and
technique regarding <br>
> typical <br>
> maintenance and restorative<br>
> procedures are welcome as well, of
course.<br>
> <br>
> In particular... keel reattachment, hull
deck joint, deck <br>
> reinforcement, <br>
> mast support, mast reconfiguration,<br>
> and rigging, both standing and running,
and rudder <br>
> reinstallation... are <br>
> of particular concern,<br>
> as I'd hate like hell to bear this
expense and later come to <br>
> grief over <br>
> a choice that could easily now be made<br>
> that would have made a much more salutary
difference in time to come.<br>
> <br>
> An additional note is that the standing
rigging is what I assume <br>
> was the <br>
> original 'rod' rigging.<br>
> <br>
> M y primary interest is not racing,
rather cruising.<br>
> <br>
> Has anyone shortened or otherwise altered
the original mast ?<br>
> <br>
> Has anyone gone outboard with the
chainplates ?<br>
> <br>
> Please include intended consequences of
any suggested alterations.<br>
> <br>
> Hoping to not cause a firestorm from
Frers purists :-)<br>
> <br>
> In any case, no alterations have been yet
made,...<br>
> <br>
> Appreciatively,<br>
> <br>
> Courtney Thomas<br>
> <br>
> -- <br>
> Any people anywhere, being inclined and
having the power,<br>
> have the right to rise up, and shake off
the existing<br>
> government, and form a new one that suits
them better,<br>
> This is a most valuable - a most sacred
right - a right,<br>
> which we hope and believe, is to liberate
the world.<br>
> Abraham Lincoln<br>
> <br>
>
_______________________________________________<br>
> frers-list mailing list<br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
class="yiv92727026moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
ymailto="mailto:frers-list@lists.frers33.com" target="_blank"
href="mailto:frers-list@lists.frers33.com">frers-list@lists.frers33.com</a><br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true" rel="nofollow"
class="yiv92727026moz-txt-link-freetext"
target="_blank"
href="http://lists.frers33.com/mailman/listinfo/frers-list">http://lists.frers33.com/mailman/listinfo/frers-list</a><br>
> </span></font></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
--------------050101010201090104010004--